debitage

Occupation
    Surface
    Backfill
    About

Flintknapper
    email
    AIM: Acsumama
    Home
    Potato God

Landscape
Field Crew
    Yuccacentric
    Blistered Avalon
    Fancy Wing
    Gegenwärtigkeit
    Fish Gone Bad
    Fluffy Fucknut
    Donkey Balls
    Dapplelight Dreams
    What Fresh Hell Is This?
Lab Assistants
    wockerjabby
    synesthesia
    Genarti's Journal
    Rebecca's LiveJournal
    Darin's Journal
    barbara's LiveJournal
    rabi's LiveJournal
    colourblinded
    Abbie the cat has a posse
Authorized Visitors
    minister.without.portfolio
    Hesitant Firmness
    Bouillabaisse for the Soul
    Disturbing Search Requests
    Search Extract Poetry

Kiosk
    Multimania is currently in the Kiosk.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses stylesheets. Which means you shouldn't use Netscape.

Comments by yaccs

© Eemeet Meeker Online Enterprises, to the extent that slapping up a copyright notice constitutes actual copyright protection.

 

% 15.3.02

# I ran into Chris, who was coming down the Persson stairs.

She asked, "Why do you have that big grin on your face?"

"I could hear you whistling 'Sunshine of Your Love' when I was coming around the Student Union."
posted by Stentor Danielson at 15:04 -- link --

 

# I finally got a letter in the mail from the Watson fellowship. When I took it out of my mailbox, I could feel it was thick. They don't send thick packets to losers.

And my first thoughts were "Oh crap."

I should be excited about the possibility of going to New Zealand. I should be looking forward to all the cool stuff I'd see and do down there. But I'm not. Maybe it's that I had been thinking so long about grad school that I'm just disoriented by everything changing.

But I think it's also doubts about my project. I came up with it as a Fulbright project, assuming that much of my time would be spent taking archaeology and Maori language classes at the University of Otago. But the Watson forbids you from taking formal classes. So I altered my plan for the Watson application, assuming that if I got the Watson (which as far as I could tell looked less favorably on the type of project I was planning) I would also get the Fulbright.

I can make a convincing argument to myself that, upon further consideration, my project wouldn't do justice to the Watson fellowship and that my time would be more productively spent at Clark or Wisconsin, and that the first runner-up would make better use of the money. But is this just rationalization of my fears?

People are going to be congratulating me. What do I say to them?
posted by Stentor Danielson at 12:45 -- link --

 

# Apparently the things that were chasing the kitty were Domo-kuns.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 11:27 -- link --

 

% 14.3.02

# Today was the first barefoot day of the year. It was a bit too cold for it, but I felt like it suited the spirit of the weather.

When I think about why I go barefoot, the thing that always comes to mind first is the tactileness of it. When I'm barefoot, I feel the ground with every step, instead of just feeling the inside of my sock. It adds a level of sensory experience to something as mundane as walking up the hill. I can appreciate the difference between the smooth slate steps and the grass pulling my feet in and the rough pavement where I have to watch out for scattered bits of gravel.

It's similar to the way I feel annoyed when I see people walking around with headphones on. I did that once, going up to 'Gate House to see if Marty was around late on my last day of sophomore year, with my walkman on so that I could listen to Dave's radio show. And even though it was one in the morning, every time I saw any people I would have this impulse to rip the headphones off while I passed them, so that they wouldn't see what I was doing. I feel like having headphones on means that you aren't really paying attention to what's going on, that you have made a conscious choice not to care -- the path is just something keeping you from where you're going, and you need to insulate yourself from it.

But that's kind of a hypocritical attitude for me to take. I don't wear headphones, but when I walk around I can get just as absorbed -- deliberately or not -- in whatever song is stuck in my head. Instead of listening to snatches of conversations, and the wind ruffling the trees, and my own feet on the stones, my ears are full of "yum, yum, Bumblebee, Bumblebee Tuna, I love Bumblebee, Bumblebee Tuna..." And I'm always thinking about the next thing I'm going to do -- the chart I'm going to make for The Maroon-News, the amount of time I have to eat before the lecture, the book I have to read tonight because I can't renew ILL materials.

Much as I try, I can't quite experience.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 21:18 -- link --

 

# Bush Proposes $5 Billion Boost in Aid to Poor Nations
"President Bush Thursday proposed a three-year, $5 billion boost in U.S. aid to impoverished nations that embrace economic and political reforms, the largest increase in history, saying it could help ease the despair that gave rise to Islamic militancy."

He finally does something I can approve of.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 17:23 -- link --

 

% 13.3.02

# Mugabe Wins Disputed Zimbabwe Election

Great. Just great.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 14:08 -- link --

 

# To Brunchmeet or not to Brunchmeet? All along I had assumed the answer was yes. Naturally, I want to see Barbara and Beth. But I had a bit of a scare in terms of bus schedules this week and had to consider the possibility of not going to Brunchmeet. I feel kind of guilty for saying this, given that I know Barbara and Beth were both looking forward to Brunchmeet as well, but I liked the possibility I saw. It involved less riding on the bus (five hours Colgate to Boston, instead of ten hours combined of bus and bus station Colgate to Fredonia, and then another ten from Fredonia to Boston). It would be more relaxing -- going to two places instead of three for break. It would cost significantly less. And it's not like I'll never get to see them again -- Barbara may be in DC this summer, and Clark isn't all that far from Tufts. But at the same time, I feel like I'm letting them down if I don't go. And I feel like in retrospect I'll wish I had done it. So I don't know. But I have to decide by tomorrow, so I can buy tickets on one bus or another.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 03:24 -- link --

 

# "Maintenance" and "sustenance" bother me. It seems like they should be "maintainance" and "sustainance," so as to parallel "maintain" and "sustain." "Sacrilegious" (instead of "sacreligious") is another one.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 01:37 -- link --

 

% 12.3.02

# You know an article is important and deep when its title begins with "toward." "Toward an interactive theory of nature and culture," "Toward reinventing nature," "Toward a modern environmental ethic."
posted by Stentor Danielson at 21:27 -- link --

 

# "It is a day that has started with knowing that tanks are about 50 feet from my house.
How bad can it get, I mean really, after that one?"

Sometimes you just need to see someone say something that puts it all in perspective. I figured I should count myself lucky that I can't truly understand what that's like, that my middle class heterosexual white male American scale of experience (and I've been exceptionally lucky even for a MCHWMA) doesn't reach that far.

So I went to read about it in the Post, so I'd at least know what was going on even if I couldn't really understand or feel it. And what do I notice when I get there? This. So all of a sudden I'm whipping out the atlas and running an image search on Google to see if I'm right in thinking that the Dead Sea is normally one body of water, not two. And wondering what sort of processes -- climate change? increasing withdrawals for urban drinking water? irrigated agriculture? -- are causing the sea to shrink, and how they may be similar to what's happening to the Aral Sea, and what the implications are for the Israeli/Palestinian/Jordanian environment. Completely forgetting the 17 people who died today.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 11:05 -- link --

 

# And it looks like my plans for visiting Barbara and Beth over break are down the toilet. You'd think that Shortline and Greyhound would coordinate their schedules somehow, so that it would be possible to get from Hamilton to Fredonia without waiting three hours in the bus station.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 02:11 -- link --

 

# What moron gave Björk a recording contract?
posted by Stentor Danielson at 02:07 -- link --

 

# ... and suddenly Yaccs stops working. I must be cursed.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 01:44 -- link --

 

% 11.3.02

# OK, Multimania. I gave you a chance. You were doing great for a while. But this whole not allowing new comments thing is unacceptable. Have fun sucking the D in the kiosk.

I hold no grudge against dotcomments. I'd sincerely love to continue using dotcomments. But it's not worth the effort when there's not a single reliable host for them out there. So let's see how long yaccs lasts.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 17:26 -- link --

 

# *hands the D to Multimania*

I think you know what to do with this.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 16:42 -- link --

 

# Some thoughts that came out of questions about how the Bible could say that homosexuality is bad (assuming that liberal revisionist interpretations are incorrect) when that seems to go against the principles of the faith.

In terms of ethics and code of conduct, the Bible contains two basic types of statements -- specific rules and general principles. Granted, there is more of a spectrum from the most specific rule to the most general principle, but I think my analysis still stands. This means there are two ways of looking at how they fit together.

The more common way, especially among people who take the literal truth of the Bible very seriously, is an inductive approach. In any situation, they would look first for a verse that specifically addresses their situation. If none can be found, they look for more and more general principles. Principles fill the gaps between specific commands, which can operate as exceptions to the principles.

But I would take a more deductive approach. To me, the principles are what's key. We can then reason from the principles to more specific rules for whatever situation we encounter. The rules in the Bible, then, are attempts by the authors to do just that. They can be useful as far as giving us the answers to tough problems (which we can later verify for ourselves). But this deduction is context-specific. So it is important to always be checking St. Paul's reasoning, to make sure that he wasn't either thinking of a slightly different situation, or simply mistaken. EIther way, the principles always supersede the rules.
posted by Stentor Danielson at 10:32 -- link --