|
| ||||||
|
2005 excavation at the Danielson site, Worcester MA. Yuccacentric
LiveJournal friends
Changed Priorities Ahead
Amazon.com Wishlist: Priority of 1 means I want to own it, priority of 3 means someone whose judgement I respect has recommended I read it. If a word is in bold, hover over it for an explanatory note. Hover over the links in the Advisory Committee for brief annotations. If you don't see a link for comments at the end of each post, wait a few minutes, then refresh the page -- the Yaccs server is sometimes uncooperative. People who are insulted by the use of "Democrat" as an adjective are currently in the Kiosk.
Washington Post Sydney Morning Herald The L.A. Times The Boston Globe Christian Science Monitor The Times-News The Morning Call Helsingin Sanomat El Nuevo Herald New York Times: Science Indian Country Today National Geographic News Yahoo! News: Environment and Nature Yahoo! News: Anthropology and Archaeology Yahoo! News: Native Americans IWPR: Central Asia Witchvox Arts & Letters Daily SciTech Daily Review Political Theory Daily Review Washington Monthly The Nation The American Prospect The New Republic Weekly Standard National Review Reason Grist Magazine Mother Jones TomPaine.com Worcester Magazine In the Hall of Ma'at Internet Sacred Text Archive Wikipedia Daryl Cagle's Professional Cartoonists Index |
2.2.06 The big story about the State of the Union has been Bush's promise to reduce imports of Middle Eastern oil by 75%. This cheered many environmentalists as matter of agenda-setting, despite the recognition that the actual amount of reduction in Bush's plan is piddling. But now we learn that Bush didn't quite mean what he said:
Environmentalists are upset. But I don't think there's any reason to be. The change from "reduce oil imports from the Middle East by 75%" and "reduce oil imports by an amount equivalent to 75% of what we get from the Middle East" makes no difference from an environmental perspective. Oil is oil, and reducing our consumption of it will have the same effect regardless of where the remaining oil comes from. Indeed, because the oil market is global, it's hard to see how we could meaningfully target Middle Eastern oil for reductions. Sure, we could shift around so that the oil that actually enters the US comes all from Canada and Venezuela. But that would just mean that Middle Eastern oil would shift around to fill in the reductions in supply to those countries' other customers. So even if Middle Eastern oil were somehow dirtier than Canadian oil, the same amount of Middle Eastern oil would be getting burned, and thus the same amount of greenhouse gasses would be released. The only thing that matters is the overall supply and demand. I don't for a minute believe that Bush will actually reduce our oil consumption by 75% of our Middle Eastern imports. And I suppose this correction will provide another entry in those lists of Bush's lies that have been oh so successful in changing the minds of Bush's supporters. But from an environmental perspective, this correction does not change the substance of Bush's promise. Stentor Danielson, 10:04, , |
|||||